MOSS / GOLD LAB
Reading evaluation
EROS CINEMA · CONTROLLED SCREENING

One scene.
Every checkpoint & strength.

Compare the untouched base with the Gold LoRA using matched prompts, seeds and sampling settings. Inspect style, composition, faces, hands and neutral controls.

RENDER PROGRESS0 / 0
CHECKPOINTS—Fixed steps + validation candidate
SAMPLING50 steps · CFG 3Shift 5 · BF16 DiT · FP32 VAE

Screening study, 16 prompts × 2 seeds. Validation loss is a subset measure; it does not establish visual quality. 125% is a stress test.

Click any ready image for a matched A/B comparison · scroll horizontally ↔
Validation curve & checkpoint provenance

The training validation subset uses 16 batches per rank at five fixed sigmas. The lowest observed mean is included as a candidate. Batch-level variance was not recorded, so no confidence interval is inferred from this curve.

Download full manifest · Frozen evaluation plan
How to review & what comes next

Review prompt adherence, composition and counts, anatomy and hands, textures and artifacts, requested cinema style, and preservation of neutral controls. Check both seeds rather than selecting a single attractive result.

Shortlist up to three checkpoint/strength pairs. A separate blind review should use raters who have not browsed this labelled gallery, randomized sides and order, ties, repeated pairs and identical-image checks. This gallery is exploratory; do not present its best-looking cell as a proven quality gain.

Lock the candidate and settings before a larger evaluation with fresh prompts and seeds. The Gold test split remains unused during screening.

Image A
Image B
Download ADownload B

Image metadata